SalarySwishSalarySwish

Pettiness at its finest

Créé par: TheCelt
Équipe: 2019-20 Jets de Winnipeg
Date de création initiale: 17 avr. 2019
Publié: 17 avr. 2019
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Légende
Gaucher
Équipe initiale
Exempté du ballottage
Droitier
Position
Clause d'échange
Max. Bonis de perf.
Statut à l’échéance du contrat
Terme restant
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
Exempté du ballottageMcDavid, Connor
12 500 000 $ (Bonis de performance250 000 $)
C
NMC
UFA - 5
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
87 250 000 $
89 250 000 $
21 800 000 $
22 000 000 $
1970 000 $
22 500 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
1900 000 $
1700 000 $
1970 000 $
Offres hostiles
Le salaire annuel moyen (AAV) de l'offre hostile est calculé en divisant la valeur totale du contrat par: 1. La durée totale du contrat, ou 2. Cinq ans
JOUEURAAVCOMPENSATION
Armia, Joel2 500 000 $
Choix de 2e ronde en 2020
Transactions
1.
WPG
  1. Fleury, Haydn [Droits de RFA]
CAR
  1. Brossoit, Laurent [Droits de RFA]
  2. Kulikov, Dmitry
  3. Vallati, Giovanni [Liste de réserve]
2.
WPG
  1. Ristolainen, Rasmus
  2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2019 (SJS)
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2019
Logo de SJS
Logo de WPG
Logo de WPG
Logo de WPG
2020
Logo de WPG
Logo de WPG
Logo de WPG
Logo de WPG
2021
Logo de WPG
Logo de WPG
Logo de WPG
Logo de WPG
Logo de WPG
Logo de WPG
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2383 000 000 $81 320 001 $0 $272 500 $1 679 999 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 6
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
6 125 000 $6 125 000 $
C
UFA - 5
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
9 250 000 $9 250 000 $
C, AD, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
7 250 000 $7 250 000 $
AG
UFA - 7
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
894 166 $894 166 $ (Bonis de performance212 500 $$212K)
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
8 250 000 $8 250 000 $
AD
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
C, AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
2 916 667 $2 916 667 $
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
894 167 $894 167 $
AG, AD
RFA - 3
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
5 291 667 $5 291 667 $
C, AD
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
741 667 $741 667 $
AD
UFA - 1
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
3 150 000 $3 150 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
5 400 000 $5 400 000 $
DD
UFA - 3
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
6 166 667 $6 166 667 $
G
UFA - 5
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
1 800 000 $1 800 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
7 600 000 $7 600 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
775 000 $775 000 $ (Bonis de performance60 000 $$60K)
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
775 000 $775 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
900 000 $900 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
970 000 $970 000 $
AG, C
UFA - 2
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
970 000 $970 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
700 000 $700 000 $
AD, C, AG
UFA

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner

Commentaires populaires

17 avr. 2019 à 22 h 17
#1
What in tarnation
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2017
Messages: 32,784
Mentions "j'aime": 31,485
Why don't just re-sign Brossoit. He's been pretty good.
17 avr. 2019 à 22 h 21
#2
Math and Sports
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 650
Mentions "j'aime": 162
Quoting: BurgerBoss
Why don't just re-sign Brossoit. He's been pretty good.


He has, but his sample size has also been pretty small, and he was not good in Edmonton (but it's Edmonton). Considering how good he's been in that small sample size, and that he's probably going to regress his trade value is probably better than his actual value. I'm a big believer in always selling high.
justaBoss a aimé ceci.
17 avr. 2019 à 22 h 44
#3
Math and Sports
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 650
Mentions "j'aime": 162
Just putting my spin on @arafay 's idea.
arafay a aimé ceci.
18 avr. 2019 à 11 h 7
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2018
Messages: 7,337
Mentions "j'aime": 2,389
Quoting: TheCelt
Just putting my spin on @arafay 's idea.


I like the idea of bringing Armia back but not for the price of a 2nd. just bring Tanev back.

Also Comrie is not Waiver exempt next year so either him or Brossiot are traded (I kept comrie because he has more upside)

I also do not think Brossiot will regress (unless traded to a defensively porous team). If anything he might even get better. He is growing a style that will do him well.
18 avr. 2019 à 14 h 55
#5
Math and Sports
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 650
Mentions "j'aime": 162
Quoting: arafay
I like the idea of bringing Armia back but not for the price of a 2nd. just bring Tanev back.

Also Comrie is not Waiver exempt next year so either him or Brossiot are traded (I kept comrie because he has more upside)

I also do not think Brossiot will regress (unless traded to a defensively porous team). If anything he might even get better. He is growing a style that will do him well.


I think anytime you go from being a top 10 goalie in per game stats for the majority of the season straight out of the blue, you should expect regression. That's not a knock on Brossoit, that's just the trend that most goalies that aren't franchise talents have shown.


As for Tanev, he is good with Lowry in the bottom 6, but it ties Lowry down to a 4th line shutdown centre. Last year Lowry was 6th on the team in scoring per ice time. Think about all the offense the Jets had on that team and Lowry was outproducing most of everyone. Now he regressed this year, but I'm at least intrigued to see what Lowry could do with some skilled line-mates. Producing on a level, similar to Little, isn't terribly unrealistic. Armia, Copp, Appleton, Roslovic, and Little have all shown that they are flexible through the lineup and can play with different linemates and not drop off too much. (Except for Laine and Little.) Getting rid of Tanev makes the bottom six much, much more flexible and an extra .5K for Armia is completely worth it imo.

I am pretty ambivalent about trading a 2nd for Army. As of this moment we have one of the youngest rosters in the NHL. We have a stud defensive prospect in Samberg who is allegedly signing with us this summer, and the 1st round pick from the Sharks to pick up a RHD or another center. The only thing I'd actually use the 2nd for if we didn't use to get a player like Armia, is to trade up higher in the draft if possible.
arafay a aimé ceci.
Voir tout